Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clyde L. DAY, Ancillary Receiver of Trustees System Service Corporation, Appellant, v. William WHITE and Roy C. Bostwick, Ancillary Receivers of Trustees System Company of Pittsburgh, of Trusco Company of Pittsburgh, and of Trustees System Company of Pennsylvania; Trustees System Company of Pittsburgh; Trusco Company of Pittsburgh, and North American Finance Company, Appellees, 1934 — 70 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Clyde L. DAY, Ancillary Receiver of Trustees System Service Corporation, Appellant, v. William WHITE and Roy C. Bostwick, Ancillary Receivers of Trustees System Company of Pittsburgh, of Trusco Company of Pittsburgh, and of Trustees System Company of Pennsylvania; Trustees System Company of Pittsburgh; Trusco Company of Pittsburgh, and North American Finance Company, Appellees
70 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clyde L. DAY, Ancillary Receiver of Trustees System Service Corporation, Appellant, v. William WHITE and Roy C. Bostwick, Ancillary Receivers of Trustees System Company of Pittsburgh, of Trusco Company of Pittsburgh, and of Trustees System Company of Pennsylvania; Trustees System Company of Pittsburgh; Trusco Company of Pittsburgh, and North American Finance Company, Appellees.
No. 5427.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
May 14, 1934.
Robert B. Johnstone, and Cassels, Potter & Bentley, all of Chicago, 111., and John C. Bane, Jr., and Reed, Smith, Shaw & MeClay, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
George Walter Smith, George D. Wick, and Campbell, Wick, Houck & Thomas, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee North American Finance Corporation.
W. Denning Stewart, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for other appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
After argument and full consideration of this ease, the court finds no error in the decree of the court below confirming the sale, which decree is accordingly affirmed.