Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. et al. v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. et al., 1952 — 344 U.S. 818 · caselaw · US
General
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. et al. v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. et al.
344 U.S. 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 70.
No. 172.
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. et al. v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. et al.
Charles E. McGee and Helmer R. Johnson for the Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.; and David T. Searls, Charles I. Francis, Charles I. Thompson, W. D. Deakins, Jr. and J. Ross Gamble for the Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., petitioners in No. 70.
Solicitor General Perlman and Bradford Ross for the Federal Power Commission, petitioner in No. 172.
Charles V. Shannon for the Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. et al., and Ray C. Westgate for the Fall River Gas Works Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 195 F. 2d 872.