Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the People's Railroad Company of Syracuse, for the Appointment of Three Commissioners to Determine Whether its Railroad Ought to be Constructed, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 661 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of the People's Railroad Company of Syracuse, for the Appointment of Three Commissioners to Determine Whether its Railroad Ought to be Constructed
117 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the People’s Railroad Company of Syracuse, for the Appointment of Three Commissioners to Determine Whether its Railroad Ought to be Constructed.
(Submitted December 9, 1889;
decided December 20, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made May 10, 1889, which confirmed the report of the commissioners appointed herein, and denied a motion to vacate the order appointing them.
Charles H. Peck for appellants.
Martin A. Knapp for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
-Order affirmed.