Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Bellman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1890 — 122 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
George Bellman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
122 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Bellman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued December 3, 1890;
decided December 16, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 22, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and reversed an order granting a motion for a new trial.
Edward Harris for appellant.
Thomas Raines for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.