Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Michael H. Hilts et al., as Assessors of the Town of Sullivan, Appellants, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Michael H. Hilts et al., as Assessors of the Town of Sullivan, Appellants
163 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Michael H. Hilts et al., as Assessors of the Town of Sullivan, Appellants.
People ex rel. N. T. O. <& S. B. B. B. Oo. v. Silts, 47 App. Div. 629, affirmed.
(Argued June 4, 1900;
decided June 19, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered February 27, 1900, affirming an order of Special Term correcting the assessment against relator in. the town of Sullivan for the year 1897.
G. A. Hitchcock for appellants.
Albert H. Harris for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Landon and Cullen, JJ.