Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co. et al., 1938 — 304 U.S. 553 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co. et al.
304 U.S. 553·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 915.
Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co. et al.
April 28, 1938.
Solicitor General Jackson and Mr. Oswald Ryan for petitioner.
Messrs. Walter Biddle Saul, C. Edward Paxson, Edward F. Huber, and Geo. J. Banigan ,for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.