Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 858 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al.
361 U.S. 858·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 19, 1959.
No. 1,
October Term, 1957.
United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al.
George B. Christensen for Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al., and William T. Kirby . for Sullivan, movants. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States in opposition.
[See 355 U. S. 233, 352 U. S. 997.]
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file motions to vacate orders of December 16, 1957, granting certiorari etc. and for other relief is denied.