Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Utah v. United States, 1967 — 389 U.S. 909 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Utah v. United States
389 U.S. 909·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 23, 1967.
No. 31,
Orig.
Utah v. United States.
L. M. McBride, Frank A. Wollaeger, Myer Feldman and Martin Jacobs on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of Morton International, Inc., for leave to intervene and file an answer is referred to the Special Master.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
[For earlier orders herein, see 387 U. S. 902, 388 U. S. 902.]