Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Aaron HAAS, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, et al., 2019 — 139 S. Ct. 1648 · caselaw · US
General
Aaron HAAS, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, et al.
139 S. Ct. 1648·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Aaron HAAS, et al., petitioners,
v.
CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, et al.
No. 18-8520.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 29, 2019.
Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until May 20, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.