General
Nathaniel George et al., Respondents, v. Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant
175 N.Y. 488·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nathaniel George et al., Respondents, v. Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant.
George v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 73 App. Div. 626, affirmed.
(Argued May 12, 1903;
decided June 2, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 13, 1902, affirming a judgment jn favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Sherrill Babcock, Julien T. Davies and Charles A. Gardiner for appellant.
Charles H. Strong for respondents. .
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, J J.