Criminal Law · MBE-tested
East River Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Ephraim Samuels, Julius Samuels, Isidore Samuels and Clinton T. Taylor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants
257 A.D. 940·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
East River Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Ephraim Samuels, Julius Samuels, Isidore Samuels and Clinton T. Taylor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to dismiss as to so much of the cause of action set forth in the complaint as attempts to establish against the appellants individually liability for a deficiency judgment. [170 Misc. 779.]