General

Rhonda Albans et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants

202 A.D.2d 616612 N.Y.S.2d 871·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1994·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Rhonda Albans et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants. [612 NYS2d 871] [MAJORITY] —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 15, 1992, as denied those branches of their motion which were for discovery with respect to items numbered 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12 of the plaintiffs’ demand, restricted compliance with regard to items numbered 2, 3, 4, and 11 of the demand, and denied their request for a further deposition of a witness with knowledge. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. We reject the plaintiffs’ contention that the court improperly limited discovery (see, CPLR 3101 [a]; 3120 [a] [1] [i]; Benzenberg v Telecom Plus, 119 AD2d 717). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.