Contracts · MBE-tested
Kaufman et al. v. Brownell, Attorney General, et al. ; and Attenhofer et al. v. Brownell, Attorney General
355 U.S. 842·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 298.
No. 299.
Kaufman et al. v. Brownell, Attorney General, et al. ; and Attenhofer et al. v. Brownell, Attorney General.
Robert E. Sher, Isadore G. Aik, James H. Heller, Irving Moskovitz and Peter N. Schiller for petitioners in No. 298. Edmund L. Jones and C. Frank Reifsnyder for petitioners in No. 299. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, George B. Searls, Sidney B. Jacoby and Ernest S. Carsten for respondents.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the Dis-
trict of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 101 U. S. App. D. C. 147, 247 F. 2d 553.