Contracts · MBE-tested
Wapnick v. United States; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
383 U.S. 923·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1044,
No. 494,
October Term, 1962.
October Term, 1964.
Wapnick v. United States, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.,
[MAJORITY]
374 U. S. 829, 375 U. S. 871; and
379 U. S. 934, 986. Motions for leave to file second petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.