Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FRANK ADAMS & CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1963 — 375 U.S. 215 · caselaw · US
General
FRANK ADAMS & CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
375 U.S. 215·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FRANK ADAMS & CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 506.
Decided December 9, 1963.
Howard Gould for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Or-rick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
F. B. Henderson, Richard J. Murphy, Kemper A. Dobbins, R. B. Claytor and Robert H. Bierma for appellee rail carriers.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of Henry B. Street for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel fpr the appellants is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.