Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Pierce Brothers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1954 — 347 U.S. 915 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Pierce Brothers v. National Labor Relations Board
347 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 8, 1954.
No. 438.
No. 479.
Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Pierce Brothers v. National Labor Relations Board.
Dana Latham, Paul R. Watkins and Richard W. Lund for petitioners.
Ugene U. Blalock also for petitioner in No. 438. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling and Dominick L. Manoli for respondent. Briefs of amici curiae supporting petitioners were filed by James R. Clark and Burton E. Robinson for the National Funeral Directors Association of the United States, Inc.; and by John C. Slade for the National Selected Morticians, Inc. in No. 479.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to defer consideration denied. Certiorari denied.