Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Tony PENNINGTON v. STATE of Arkansas

347 Ark. 36864 S.W.3d 708·Arkansas Supreme Court·2002·AR

IMBER, J., not participating.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Tony PENNINGTON v. STATE of Arkansas CR 01-1352 64 S.W.3d 708 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 10, 2002 Walker, Shock & Cox, P.L.L.C., by: James O. Cox, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — P lER CURIAM.] P lER CURIAM. Appellant Tony Pennington, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Attorney, James O. Cox, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. IMBER, J., not participating.