Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The National Contracting Company, Respondent, v. Hudson River Water Power Company, Appellant, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 560 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
The National Contracting Company, Respondent, v. Hudson River Water Power Company, Appellant
184 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The National Contracting Company, Respondent, v. Hudson River Water Power Company, Appellant.
(Argued February 26, 1906;
decided March 6, 1906.)
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 170 N. Y. 439.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted so far as to give the plaintiff the right to apply at Special Term for the withdrawal of the demurrer to the third defense set up in the. answer upon such terms and conditions as the Supreme Court may impose.