Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. K. DAVIDSON et al. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF WYANDOTTE, State of KANSAS, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1057 · caselaw · US
General
J. K. DAVIDSON et al. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF WYANDOTTE, State of KANSAS
59 F.2d 1057·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. K. DAVIDSON et al. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF WYANDOTTE, State of KANSAS.
No. 539.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
March 1, 1932.
Harding, Murphy & Tucker, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellants.
Roland Boynton, Atty. Gen., for, appel-lee.
Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Appeal dismissed on stipulation.