Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James M. DORAN, Prohibition Commissioner, et al., Appellants, v. Martin H. CASPER, Trading as Delmar Mfg. Co., Appellee, and 26 other cases, 1930 — 41 F.2d 994 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
James M. DORAN, Prohibition Commissioner, et al., Appellants, v. Martin H. CASPER, Trading as Delmar Mfg. Co., Appellee, and 26 other cases
41 F.2d 994·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James M. DORAN, Prohibition Commissioner, et al., Appellants, v. Martin H. CASPER, Trading as Delmar Mfg. Co., Appellee, and 26 other cases.
Nos. 4128, 4119, 4121-4127, 4129-4133, 4208, 4212, 4228-4237, 4239.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 14, 1930.
Calvin S. Boyer, U. S. Atty., Richard H. Woolsey and Edward C. Dougherty, Sp. Attys., all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
Michael Serodj and Patrick J. Uriel, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Before BÜEEINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.]
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed by this court that the decree of the said District Court [30 F.(2d) 400] in this cause he, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Eor answers to certified questions, see 281 U. S. 610, 50 S. Ct. 415, 74 L. Ed. 1070.