Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry R. Pierson, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Richard A. McCurdy, Respondent, 1885 — 100 N.Y. 608 · caselaw · US
General
Henry R. Pierson, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Richard A. McCurdy, Respondent
100 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry R. Pierson, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Richard A. McCurdy, Respondent.
(Argued June 10, 1885;
decided October 6, 1885.)
This action was brought to recover certain moneys which the complaint alleged defendant received from the officers of the company of which plaintiff is receiver, and which defendant had unlawfully applied and used in the purchase of the stock of another insurance company.
The transaction complained of occurred in October, 1871; the action was commenced in 1879. Among other things the statute ot limitations was pleaded as a defense.
The case was decided here upon the ground that the statute was a bar.
B. F. Tracy for appellant.
John E. Develin for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.