Contracts · MBE-tested
Potash v. Clark, Attorney General, et al.
338 U.S. 879·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 366.
Potash v. Clark, Attorney General, et al.
Lee Pressman, Joseph Forer, David Rein, Carol King and William L. Standard for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. McGrath substituted as a party respondent for Clark. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.