Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SABURO HIGA, Appellant, v. A. E. BURNETT, District Director, U. S. Immigration Service, District No. 31, Appellee, 1932 — 61 F.2d 1038 · caselaw · US
General
SABURO HIGA, Appellant, v. A. E. BURNETT, District Director, U. S. Immigration Service, District No. 31, Appellee
61 F.2d 1038·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SABURO HIGA, Appellant, v. A. E. BURNETT, District Director, U. S. Immigration Service, District No. 31, Appellee.
No. 6892.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1932.
J. Edw. Keating and Theodore E. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Samuel W. McNabb, U. S. Atty., and Frank M. Chichester, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon confession in open court by counsel for appellee of error in the order of the District Court in this cause, it is ordered that the said order be reversed.