Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AT&T INC., petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al., 2018 — 139 S. Ct. 454 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
AT&T INC., petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.
139 S. Ct. 454202 L. Ed. 2d 361·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AT&T INC., petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.
No. 17-499.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 5, 2018.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would grant the petition, vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and remand to that court with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.