Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Charles B. Dunn, as Executor of Joseph C. Barnes, Deceased. Frances M. Barnes, Appellant; Herbert S. Barnes et al., Respondents, 1897 — 154 N.Y. 737 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Charles B. Dunn, as Executor of Joseph C. Barnes, Deceased. Frances M. Barnes, Appellant; Herbert S. Barnes et al., Respondents
154 N.Y. 737·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Charles B. Dunn, as Executor of Joseph C. Barnes, Deceased. Frances M. Barnes, Appellant; Herbert S. Barnes et al., Respondents.
Matter of Barnes, 7 App. Div. 13, affirmed.
(Argued October 8, 1897;
decided October 26, 1897.)
Appeal from that portion of an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 30,1896, which modified and, as modified, affirmed a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the city and county of New York rendered upon the accounting by an executor.
Robert L. Harrison for appellant.
Henry B. Anderson and Allen W. Johnson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order appealed from affirmed, with costs in t-his court to be paid by the appellant; no opinion.
All concur.