General
Belle Gottesman, Respondent, v. George Amato, Appellant
282 A.D. 1015·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1953·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Belle Gottesman, Respondent, v. George Amato, Appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
On completely conflicting affidavits from which it is impossible to determine where the truth lies, the court should not have granted complainant’s motion and increased weekly payments to twice the amount previously allowed and in addition directed a bond of $1,000.
The order appealed from should be reversed and the matter remanded for a hearing before the court giving both parties full opportunity to present’ the evidence for their conflicting claims.
Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ., concur.
Order unanimously reversed and the matter remanded for a hearing before the court giving both parties full opportunity to present the evidence for their conflicting claims. Settle order on notice.