General
Chesapeake & Ohio Coal & Coke Company v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Company
249 U.S. 585·Supreme Court of the United States·1919
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 261.
Chesapeake & Ohio Coal & Coke Company v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Company.
Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Argued for plaintiff in error March 20, 1919.
Decided March 24, 1919.
Mr. Buckner Clay, with whom Mr. George E. Price was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. W. Knight for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 128 of the Judicial Code; Stevenson v. Fain, 195 U. S. 165, 166; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444.