General
William S. Phippen, Respondent, v. Richard J. Dunphy, as Attorney in Fact, Representing All of the Underwriters at the New York and New England Underwriters at Lloyds of New York City, Appellant
133 A.D. 895·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1909·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William S. Phippen, Respondent, v. Richard J. Dunphy, as Attorney in Fact, Representing All of the Underwriters at the New York and New England Underwriters at Lloyds of New York City, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.