General
In the Matter of Brian Potter, Petitioner, v. Howard Safir, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents
284 A.D.2d 156728 N.Y.S.2d 428·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2001·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Brian Potter, Petitioner, v Howard Safir, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
[728 NYS2d 428]
[MAJORITY]
—Determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, dated March 3, 2000, which imposed a forfeiture of 20 vacation days, upon a finding, after a hearing, that petitioner unjustifiably and without provocation struck an individual with a nightstick, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Jane Solomon, J.], entered September 15, 2000), dismissed, without costs.
Substantial evidence, including the testimony of the complainant and corroborative testimony by other witnesses, supports respondent’s findings that petitioner, without provocation or just cause, repeatedly struck an individual with a nightstick during the course of an arrest (see, Matter of Edwards v Safir, 282 AD2d 287). The penalty imposed is not shocking to our sense of fairness, particularly in view of the seriousness of the offense (see, Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32). Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.