Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ellen Andrews, Appellant, v. Daniel W. Raymond, Respondent, 1874 — 58 N.Y. 676 · caselaw · US
General
Ellen Andrews, Appellant, v. Daniel W. Raymond, Respondent
58 N.Y. 676·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ellen Andrews, Appellant, v. Daniel W. Raymond, Respondent.
(Argued September 30, 1874;
decided October 6, 1874.)
Repobted below, 2 New York Supreme Court (T. & C.), 661.
The principal questions presented upon this appeal were upon exceptions to the refusal of the court before whom the cause was tried to find certain facts. The court reiterated the rule that to sustain such an exception it must be made to appear not only that evidence was given proving the fact, but that there was no evidence tending to the contrary conclusion, and held, that there was evidence conflicting with that necessary to maintain the case as claimed by appellant.
Amos H. Prescott for the appellant.
S. S. Morgan for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Johnson, J.,]
Johnson, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.