General
The Hecla Consolidated Gold Mining Company, Respondent, v. William Lane O'Neill, Appellant
148 N.Y. 724·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Hecla Consolidated Gold Mining Company, Respondent, v. William Lane O’Neill, Appellant.
Mem. of decision below, 67 Hun, 652.
(Argued November 27, 1895;
decided December 19, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order-made February 17, 1893, which affirmed a final judgment of the Special Term entered May 16, 1892, upon an interlocutory judgment entered April 2, 1892, sustaining a demurrer by plaintiff to defendant’s answer and counterclaim.
William Lane O'Neill for appellant.
J. Noble Hayes for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.