Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bailiff v. Tipping, 1805 — 6 U.S. 406 · caselaw · US
General
Bailiff v. Tipping
6 U.S. 4062 Cranch 406·Supreme Court of the United States·1805
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bailiff v. Tipping.
Citation.
Qucere i Whether the courts of the United States have jurisdiction, in cases between aliens ? A citation must accompany the writ of error.
Where both parties are aliens, the federal courts have no jurisdiction, by reason of the character of the parties. Montalet v. Murray, 4 Cr. 46; Hinckley v. Byrne, 1 Deady 224.
[MAJORITY]
The only question in this case would have been, whether one alien could sue another alien, in the courts of the United States. The Circuit Court for the Kentucky district was of opinion, that they had no jurisdiction in such a case. But the writ of error was dismissed for want of a citation.
See ante, p. 263, the opinion of the court, in the case of Mason v. The Ship Blaireau.