Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bauer-Smith Dredging Co., Inc., v. Tully et al., 1958 — 358 U.S. 842 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Bauer-Smith Dredging Co., Inc., v. Tully et al.
358 U.S. 842·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 250.
Bauer-Smith Dredging Co., Inc., v. Tully et al.
T. G. Schirmeyer for petitioner. Ewell Strong and Geo. A. Weller for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to'file brief of National Association of River and Harbor Contractors, as amicus curiae, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Ninth Supreme Judicial District, denied.