Tax

Bercut-Vandervoort & Co., Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 278·United States Customs Court·1955

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Before the Third Division October 20, 1955 No. 59374. protest 192782-K (San Francisco). Bercut-Vandervoort & Co., Inc. v. United States, [MAJORITY — Johnson, Judge:] DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS Johnson, Judge: The above-entitled case was submitted for decision on defendant’s motion to dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that plaintiff had failed to file a claim for refund with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, as provided in section 3772 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U. S. C. § 3772). The facts and circumstances are identical with those set forth in our decision on the motion to dismiss protest 192781-K (Bercut-Vandervoort & Co., Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 113, C. D. 1730), decided concurrently herewith. For the reasons therein given, the Government’s motion to dismiss the protest herein is denied. It is so ordered.