Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Caritativo v. California et al., 1958 — 356 U.S. 971 · caselaw · US
General
Caritativo v. California et al.
356 U.S. 971·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 561.
Caritativo v. California et al.
George T. Davis for petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California. Petition for cer-tiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis were granted October 21, 1957. 355 U. S. 853. Counsel filed a brief on behalf of petitioner March 7, 1958, and the case was scheduled for argument by such counsel during the session of this Court beginning May 19, 1958. The case was argued on behalf of petitioner by such counsel on May 21, 1958. No request for appointment of counsel has been made to this Court other than that by motion filed May 2, 1958, by counsel for petitioner suggesting his own appointment. The motion is denied for lack of a timely showing of a need for an appointment.