General
Meadow Brook National Bank of Nassau County, Respondent, v. Putnam Fur Farm, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Samuel B. Brouner, Appellant
6 A.D.2d 1013·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1958·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Meadow Brook National Bank of Nassau County, Respondent, v. Putnam Fur Farm, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Samuel B. Brouner, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision. Present — Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.