General
James D. Wolf vs. George F. Usher
28 U.S. 2693 Pet. 269·Supreme Court of the United States·1830
Mr Coxe, for plaintiff; Mr Whipple, for defendant.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James D. Wolf vs. George F. Usher.
Where the point on which the judges of the circuit court divided in opinion was not certified, but the point of difference was to be ascertained from the whole record, the court refused to take jurisdiction of the case.
[MAJORITY]
This cause came before the court on a certificate of á division betweén the judges of the circuit court of the district of Rhode Island.
When the case was opened by the counsel for the plaintiff, it was found on inspecting the record, that the. particular point on which the judges of the circuit court had differed, was not certified. The whole record had been sent up, and it contained a certificate that the judges of the court had differed in opinion, without a specific statement of what the difference was.
The court refused to take jurisdiction of the cause, and remanded.the same to the circuit court of Rhode Island, with directions to proceed therein' according to law.
Mr Coxe, for plaintiff; Mr Whipple, for defendant.