Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eliza B. Clinger, Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company of Kentucky et al., 1912 — 226 U.S. 602 · caselaw · US
General
Eliza B. Clinger, Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company of Kentucky et al.
226 U.S. 602·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 236.
Eliza B. Clinger, Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company of Kentucky et al.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
Motion to dismiss submitted November 11, 1912.
Decided November 18, 1912.
Mr. Allan D. Cole for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. E. L. Worthington for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. McCabe, 213 U. S. 207.