Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fred W. Lake and H. H. Snow, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Mary A. Bonynge and W. A. Bonynge, 1914 — 232 U.S. 715 · caselaw · US
General
Fred W. Lake and H. H. Snow, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Mary A. Bonynge and W. A. Bonynge
232 U.S. 715·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 680.
Fred W. Lake and H. H. Snow, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Mary A. Bonynge and W. A. Bonynge.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted December 22, 1913.
Decided January 19, 1914.
Mr. James F. Peck and Mr. Charles C. Boynton for the plaintiffs in error, Mr. William J. Hunsaker, Mr. E. W. Britt and Mr. Frank H. Short for the defendants in error. ■
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of: First. Pomeroy’s Lessee v. State Bank of Indiana, 1 Wall. 592, 597; New Orleans & Northeastern R. R. Co. v. Jopes, 142 U. S. 18, 22; Ward v. Joslin, 186 U. S. 142, 153; Holt v. United States, 218 U. S. 245. Second. Arkansas Southern R. R. Co. v. German National Bank, 207 U. S. 270; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State of Texas, 212 U. S. 112.