Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
American Preservers' Company, Appellant, v. The Columbia Investment Company, Respondent, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
American Preservers' Company, Appellant, v. The Columbia Investment Company, Respondent
155 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
American Preservers’ Company, Appellant, v. The Columbia Investment Company, Respondent.
Am. Preservers’ Co. v. Col. Investment Co., 11 Mise. Rep. 126, affirmed.
(Argued January 25, 1898;
decided March 1, 1898.)
Appeal from, an order of the General Term of the late Superior Court of Buffalo, entered February 15, 1895, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes, and granted a new trial.
Simon Fleischmann for appellant.
Nathaniel W. Norton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., absent.