Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. Producers Livestock Marketing Association; and Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, v. Producers Livestock Marketing Association, 1957 — 353 U.S. 982 · caselaw · US
General
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. Producers Livestock Marketing Association; and Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, v. Producers Livestock Marketing Association
353 U.S. 982·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 917.
No. 981.
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. Producers Livestock Marketing Association; and Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, v. Producers Livestock Marketing Association.
Winston S. Howard, Ashley Sellers, Albert L. Reeves, Jr. and Jesse E. Baskette for petitioner in No. 917. Robert L. Farrington, Neil Brooks and Donald A. Campbell for petitioner in No. 981. Had-lond P. Thomas for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.