Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. W. Bradbury, 1911 — 223 U.S. 711 · caselaw · US
General
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. W. Bradbury
223 U.S. 711·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 555.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. W. Bradbury.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa.
Motions to dismiss or affirm and for damages submitted November 6, 1911.
Decided November 13, 1911.
Mr. Carroll Wright for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Horatio F. Dale and Mr. John G. Myerly for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Southern Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U. S. 20; Schlemmer v. Buffalo &c. Ry. Co., 205 U. S. 1; and 220 U. S. 590.