Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry W. T. Steinway, Appellant, v. William Steinway et al., Respondents, 1899 — 157 N.Y. 710 · caselaw · US
General
Henry W. T. Steinway, Appellant, v. William Steinway et al., Respondents
157 N.Y. 710·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry W. T. Steinway, Appellant, v. William Steinway et al., Respondents.
Steinway v. Steinway, 3 App. Div. 301, affirmed.
(Argued November 30, 1898;
decided January 10, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 17, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint upon the merits, on trial' at Special Term.
James G. Garter and Edward, B. Hill for appellant.
George TV. Gotterill for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent, and Martin, J., not sitting.
\