Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Bogart, Respondent, v. The New York and Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 550 · caselaw · US
General
John Bogart, Respondent, v. The New York and Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
191 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Bogart, Respondent, v. The New York and Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.
Bogart v. Nexo York <& Long Island R. R. Go., 118 App. Div. 50, affirmed.
(Argued March 9, 1908;
decided March 31, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 12, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for services alleged to have been rendered.
Edward E. Sprague, George L. Kobbé and George W. Wickersham for appellant.
George M. Pinney, Jr., and Aaron C. Thayer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with co'sts; no opinion.
Concur; Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.