Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arizona v. California et al., 1978 — 438 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
General
Arizona v. California et al.
438 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 8,
Orig.
Arizona v. California et al.
[MAJORITY]
Joint motion of the States and the United States for entry of a supplemental decree; motion of Fort Mojave Indian Tribe et al. for leave to intervene as indispensable parties; and motion of Colorado River Indian Tribes et al. for leave to intervene are set for oral argument on Monday, October 2, 1978. A total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument. [For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 383 U. S. 268.]