Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
City of Chicago, Appellant, v. Chicago City Railway Company, 1907 — 205 U.S. 549 · caselaw · US
General
City of Chicago, Appellant, v. Chicago City Railway Company
205 U.S. 549·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 166.
City of Chicago, Appellant, v. Chicago City Railway Company.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District, of Illinois.
April 8, 1907.
Decree reversed with costs, on confession of error and consent of counsel, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law, on motion of Mr. John P. Wilson for the appellee.
Mr. James Hamilton Lewis and Mr. Edgar Bronson Tolman for appellant. Mr. John P. Wilson and Mr. John J. Herrick for appellee.