General
Julia E. Rogers, Respondent, v. The Trustees of the New York and Brooklyn Bridge, Appellant
159 N.Y. 556·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julia E. Rogers, Respondent, v. The Trustees of the New York and Brooklyn Bridge, Appellant.
Rogers v. New York & Brooklyn Bridge, 11 App. Div. 141, affirmed.
(Argued May 10, 1899;
decided June 6, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 6, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
James G. Bergen for appellant.
James D. Bell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., dissenting.