Corporations
Nancy Hirshberg, Respondent, v. Mayday Hardware & Supply Co., Inc., Defendant, and White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corporation, Appellant
100 A.D.2d 573·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1984·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nancy Hirshberg, Respondent, v Mayday Hardware & Supply Co., Inc., Defendant, and White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corporation, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated February 10,1983, affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs (see Johantgen v Hobart Mfg. Co., 64 AD2d 858; Ribley v Harsco Corp., 84 Misc 2d 744, affd 57 AD2d 228). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and Fiber, JJ., concur.