Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Richard F. Olpherts, Appellant, v. Frank Sullivan Smith, Respondent, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 593 · caselaw · US
General
Richard F. Olpherts, Appellant, v. Frank Sullivan Smith, Respondent
173 N.Y. 593·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard F. Olpherts, Appellant, v. Frank Sullivan Smith, Respondent.
Olpherts v. Smith, 54 App. Div. 514, affirmed.
(Argued December 11, 1902;
decided January 6, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 10, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Wayland E. Benjamin for appellant.
Frederic W. Frost and C. Walter Artz for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Cullen, JJ.