Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John L. SHEVENELL et al., Petitioners, 1928 — 30 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
John L. SHEVENELL et al., Petitioners
30 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John L. SHEVENELL et al., Petitioners.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
June 28, 1928.
No. 2264.
C. Frank Hathaway, of Lynn, Mass., for petitioner.
Marcus B. May, of Boston, Mass., opposed.
Before BINGHAM and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and HALE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It is ordered that the petition for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus be, and the same hereby is, denied.